Irish stance on GM crops criticised by EU Commission
talk2eu
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



Irish stance on GM crops criticised by EU... Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 20/10/2009 11:32:37
Forum Member

Forum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum Member

Group: Moderators
Last Login: 07/12/2009 17:05:48
Posts: 44, Visits: 165
What do you think about Ireland's outright ban on GM crops? Protecting the people, or keeping a closed mind?


From the Irish Independent.
Tuesday October 20 2009
http://www.independent.ie/farming/fischer-boel-slams-irish-stance-on-gm-1918260.html

The anti-GM stance taken by Ireland and other EU states has been lambasted by the EU Agriculture Commissioner Mariann Fischer Boel.
The commissioner warned that delays in approving new GM crop varieties were restricting access to vital protein sources, such as soya, and would cost farmers millions of euro in higher feed charges this winter.

Ms Fischer Boel called for decisions on GM crops to be based on scientific evaluation rather than political considerations. She described as "ludicrous" a situation where member states openly frustrated the authorisation process for new GM crops by abstaining in key votes, but later seek export refunds for animal products because of increased feed costs.

Ireland has abstained in a number of votes on new GM crops since the present Government took office in 2007.

While Ireland was not singled out for criticism by the commissioner, a source close to Ms Fischer Boel accused countries that abstained of "chickening out" of the debate.

Ms Fischer Boel insisted that the EU approach in assessing the risks posed by GM crops was based on science and she challenged detractors of the existing approval process to study it.
"If any GMO is shown to have adverse affects on human health, animal health or the environment, we will not authorise it. Look at the rules; it's there in black and white," she said.

The commissioner claimed that authorisations for new GM crops were usually delayed because of political considerations rather than genuine scientific reservations.
She pointed out that clearance for GM varieties is based on independent scientific advice from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

However, the Commissioner said EFSA recommendations were being ignored by politicians from some member states.
"Month after month, GMOs receive a clean bill of health from EFSA but then get stuck because member states cannot get a qualified majority, in favour or against, when it comes to the proposal on authorisation."

Ms Fischer Boel said the delays in clearing crops for use would be "legitimate" if new scientific information was being put on the table.

However, she said this was not the case.
The crops are invariably passed for use by the commission but the current difficulties have disrupted trade.
The commissioner pointed out that since July this year, 12 shipments of US soya had been held up in European ports because minute traces of an unapproved GM maize variety had been found in them.
She said US feed exporters were now reluctant to ship soya to Europe and she warned that the EU livestock sector faced "disaster" should the trade be blocked.
Europe imports 32m tons of soya each year.

Availability this winter is coming under pressure due to drought in Argentina and increased demand from China.

- Declan O'Brien




------------------
www.talktoeu.ie
Post #264
Posted 20/10/2009 12:14:01
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 02/02/2010 12:55:02
Posts: 11, Visits: 27
We are definitely going to be playing catch up more and more with countries like Argentina and Brazil with the mass producing capabilities for GM crops.

GM crops can be good. They are more sustainable and resistible, but there's too much murky waters.
Also, massive companies like Monsanto who are copy writing seeds...i.e. nature!! is ridiculous.

But I think if we can sustain ourselves on GM free crops, then so be it.
Post #265
Posted 05/11/2009 09:01:56
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/11/2009 17:33:56
Posts: 10, Visits: 29
Very much in favour of keeping GM crops out of the echo system for as long as possible.
Post #286
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


Reading This Topic Expand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.
Forum Moderators: Admin, jkil

Permissions Expand / Collapse

All times are GMT, Time now is 3:44

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2010
Execution: 0.188. 9 queries. Compression Disabled.